Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to the International Journal of Intellectual Discourse (IJID) will be reviewed in a double-blind review method. Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers (double-blind review method). In general, each article will be reviewed by one to two people reviews.

The outcomes of the review will be the basis for the Editor-in-Chief to conclude
1. Revisions Required
2. Accept Submission
3. Decline Submission

An article will be rejected for publication due to various considerations: (1) if the article does not fit the scope, (2) if the article does not follow the rules of writing scientific papers / do not follow the guidelines authors, (3) if there are fundamental methodological errors, (4) if the author refuses to make suggestions of improvements provided by the reviewer without a logical basis, and (5) if there are indications of plagiarism of more than 20%